RemedyHearts, I do agree with you, I'm also personally inclined towards the claims being generally true, though like others I'd rather wait for more information. But, the post isn't an unbiased documentation of the events. From the wording and the clickbait-y title, it was clearly written with the goal of making people angry at Hussie (or angrier than they already were), not necessarily to inform them. Appealing to emotion first and truth second.

Even if you accept the events and claims in the post as true, it's still good to take the whole thing with a grain of salt and consider what might've been embellished or left out. Someone who describes himself as "pure of heart" and is presenting only one side of the narrative in a fiercely-worded blog post is probably not going to include the parts that make himself look bad.