Re: cami

Yeah, I think thats the only reasonable way to handle it right now, we work with what’s in front of us.

Right now, Gio's post is the only detailed account anyone's put forward, so of course it's going to be the reference point for discussion. That doesnt mean we're goign to treat it like gospel, but it also doesn’t mean we ignore it just because its ''one side.'' If there are genuine inaccuracies or things left out, then the best way to resolve that is for the other parties to actually put out their own statement or evidence, not for people to vaguely imply ''some of this is false'' without clarifying what.

Until then, the fairest approach is to take the claims seriously, cross reference them with what we already know about Hussies history, and be ready to reevaluate if/when new information comes out. Silence from the other side doesnt make Gio automatically correct, but it also doesnt make him automatically wrong. :)