I don't think gio outright lies about things, but he does conveniently leave out information, writes a lot leading questions to make his readers assume falsities and makes really long bad faith arguments.

One exceptionally glaring one is his comment about vast error and austin which austin DIRECTLY refutes on his twitter and bluesky

https://x.com/avstinado/status/1953948887640932581

Cami and Victoria have also already refuted other claims he's made in his blog post.

https://www.fruityrumpus.com/forums/reply/68964d40eb0e1f3bcab321ae

https://www.fruityrumpus.com/forums/reply/68965ec9eb0e1f3bcabd4331

Also for someone who claims he values evidence, he sure did not let the evidence speak for itself if it was really that damning.

So now it's multiple people speaking out against how gio operates and affirming support for HIBC/FRAF/etc but still gio's word wins out? ok.