In topic: "Tell me something that Vriska did "wrong" and I'll tell you why it was justified"

Monday, August 18th, 2025, 0:51 AM21 days ago

re:sabhait


w/ Regards to killing Aradia, It would be one thing if he just told her "this is going to happen." and she did it. But that's not what happened. Scratch and Vriska didn't just have a normal conversation; she was literally a child at the lowest moment of her life being simultaneously tormented by spirits of the dead and manipulated by an omniscient and malevolent godlike entity with millions of years of experience and perfect insight into all of her thoughts.


She was never even considering murder until Scratch brought it up.


"Aren't you going to kill her?

AG: Who????????

Your friend.

The one who summoned the spirits.

AG: Will that make them go away?

Does it matter?

She brought them here to torment you. This obviously warrants revenge.

You know you're going to anyway. You won't be able to help yourself.

AG: I don't have to do shit!

AG: May8e I don't mind ghosts. May8e they'll 8e gr8 company once I get used to them!

No, they are terrifying you.

There's only one thing to do.

[...]

AG: 8ut I was never gonna kill these people. They were like, off limits I guess?

AG: These games were just supposed to 8e fun and serve no other purpose!" (pg. 2244)



And w/ regards to Bec Noir: So what? Literally so what? Like, her creating him had exactly 0 consequences compared to her not creating him. It's a net neutral action.

8ut you already knew that, right?

StarlitSelene