RE: SAHcon

i personally do not know pretty much anything about that situation, and i'm not commenting on it, but just the way it was used as "evidence" in the article. what the article does is cite the situation, establish exactly two facts on the timeline: partnership with HICU, and after a member of con staff being forced out of the con. the evidence the article specifically cites says "i don't know what exactly happened, i can make guesses, i do not have the full story". and this somehow turns into "andrew hussie forced a member of staff to leave the con", which is a huge leap to just make, and seems like gio just projecting pre-existing biases and making extrapolations based on the narrative he wants to tell.