"I just believe that having Gio edit or take down the articles isn't nice"

..... "nice?" Honestly I think Hussie should could have been a lot less nice, with what Gio has done in the past. A lot of people are acting as if Gio is a neutral party here.

But you're also saying the point itself. They wanted to work with Bambosh, who actually made the initial thing. It's far more Bambosh's than Gio's imo. Bambosh wasn't the one pointing fingers at other members of Hussie's team. If they HAD to work with Gio, then of course they were going to have stipulations.

Even "could've also lasted that long because Hussie became insistent of having Gio edit/remove the articles while Gio still pushed on with his belief that Hussie would "drop the issue"" - yes Hussie would be insistent on their condition to work with Gio being met. Just like Gio was insistent on not meeting that condition. So they just couldn't come to an agreement, which happens! But Gio acting like he's a victim and as @timeisrestored said, trying to get people to not give money to HSBC/FRAF (which I'll emphasize, ONCE AGAIN is Gio attacking people who work with or are affiliated with Hussie when he's unable to reach Hussie themself) is indicative of how Gio has to churn this up into his "scorpion and frog" analogy, instead of just facing the facts. If you're reliant on someone else's goodwill, maybe understand that you shouldn't be targeting their co-workers!